핵심요약

• 110일 간의 전쟁으로 석유 및 가스 회사로 3740억 달러가 이전되었습니다.
• 2026년 말까지 추가로 1998억 달러를 석유에, 1281억 달러를 가스에 지출할 것으로 예상되며, 총 7000억 달러 이상이 전쟁으로 인한 비용으로 발생할 전망입니다.
• 350.org는 이 추정치가 보수적이며, 연료 가격 상승 또는 호르무즈 해협 폐쇄로 인한 비료 부족으로 인한 인플레이션이나 경제 생산 및 고용에 미치는 영향을 고려하지 않았다고 경고했습니다.
• 트럼프의 전쟁 종결 합의로도 스트레이트 오브 호르무즈가 즉시 재개방되더라도 여전히 큰 고통이 예상됩니다.

도입

이 기사는 트럼프의 이란 전쟁이 글로벌 에너지 시장에 미치는 장기적 영향을 분석한 보고서입니다. 투자자에게 이 기사가 중요한 이유는 전쟁으로 인한 에너지 가격 상승이 화석연료 업계의 수익에 미치는 영향을 이해하기 위함입니다. 또한, 전쟁 종결 이후에도 지속될 수 있는 경제적 고통을 고려할 필요가 있습니다.

본문 1: 화석연료 업계의 수익 증가

기사의 핵심 숫자 중 하나는 110일 간의 전쟁으로 석유 및 가스 회사로 3740억 달러가 이전되었습니다. 이는 비전쟁 시나리오 대비 추가적인 수익을 의미합니다. 이 수익 증가는 에너지 가격 상승으로 인해 발생한 것으로, 소비자와 기업이 부담한 추가 비용이 화석연료 업계의 수익으로 전환된 것입니다. 이는 화석연료 업계의 주가 상승과 같은 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 그러나 이는 또한 에너지 가격의 변동성과 같은 리스크를 고려해야 합니다.

본문 2: 경제적 고통의 지속 가능성

350.org는 전쟁이 종결된 후에도 에너지 가격이 높게 유지될 가능성이 높다고 경고했습니다. 이는 소비자와 기업이 지속적으로 높은 에너지 비용을 부담해야 함을 의미합니다. 또한, 호르무즈 해협의 재개방이 즉시 이루어지더라도 경제적 고통이 지속될 수 있습니다. 이는 인플레이션과 같은 경제적 영향을 고려해야 합니다. 이는 화석연료 업계의 수익 증가와는 반대되는 측면에서 분석해야 합니다.

결론

이 기사는 트럼프의 이란 전쟁이 화석연료 업계의 수익에 미치는 영향을 분석한 보고서입니다. 전쟁으로 인한 에너지 가격 상승은 화석연료 업계의 수익 증가로 이어졌지만, 동시에 소비자와 기업의 경제적 고통도 증가시켰습니다. 전쟁 종결 이후에도 에너지 가격이 높게 유지될 가능성이 높으며, 이는 인플레이션과 같은 경제적 영향을 고려해야 합니다. 투자자는 이 점을 고려하여 화석연료 업계의 장기적 전망을 분석해야 합니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiywFBVV95cUxQYkx4U2RQcDJidDhXX01IQm5mQTJNSkFrOWNFUWpCQU1QdFowSkowenlTMDBUM1FzX2JXOEYxMWtWRlNSUV83X3lyOEZkQVhhZUFaYmZOYkhsTU5YRFFMSmlDRTNWLS1FeThXblUyVFY3YkNBemg0WHFINWQ3NHAxclhkM0dFbXZyRHRBSWw5YnJuZ0ZDZXFJUFBfMFNtWVBrNW91ZENYQVRDNVE2UWVza1c4RmZGcDdwZURwS2EwOEVXSlNsYTRfdnZvSQ?oc=5

Thanks to Trump’s Iran War Disaster, Fossil Fuel Industry to Enjoy $700 Billion Windfall in 2026 - Alaska Native News

“We witness not only a massive fossil fuel crisis but a vast upward transfer of wealth built on instability of fossil fuel markets and pain,” said an expert at 350.org.

US President Donald Trump’s war with Iran may finally be reaching a close. But consumers and businesses around the world will continue to pay the price in the months ahead as still-elevated energy costs funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to fossil fuel giants.

That’s according to a report from the environmental group 350.org released Thursday, following Trump’s signing of a memorandum of understanding with Iran this week to begin the process of formally ending a war that has sent global oil prices skyrocketing and saddled ordinary people with record fuel prices.

The group estimated that just 110 days of war resulted in the transfer of an additional $374 billion from consumers and businesses into the coffers of oil and gas companies beyond what would have been expected had the war never been launched.

And while Trump claims his agreement to end the war this week will avert an “economic catastrophe,” there will likely still be tremendous pain even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens promptly.

Using oil and gas pricing scenarios from the International Monetary Fund’s April 2026 World Economic Outlook and data on global consumption, 350.org predicted that by the end of the year, consumers and businesses will spend an additional $199.8 billion on oil and $128.1 billion on gas above a non-war scenario, making for a grand total of more than $700 billion as a result of the war.

This, the group said, is a conservative estimate, as it does not even take into account knock-on effects. The war will ultimately end up costing much more when factoring in inflation across the rest of the economy, resulting from higher fuel costs or fertilizer shortages caused by the strait’s closure, which has affected food prices.

It also does not take into account the resulting effects on economic output or employment as rising costs and lower consumer spending force companies to tighten their belts.

“The oil and gas industry is draining billions from people and businesses on the back of a war that has killed thousands and pushed millions toward poverty and hunger,” said Andreas Sieber, head of political Strategy at 350.org.

“Even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens tomorrow, we should expect prices to remain above pre-crisis levels,” he said. “We witness not only a massive fossil fuel crisis but a vast upward transfer of wealth built on instability of fossil fuel markets and pain.”

While the war has brought it into starker relief, previous reports from 350.org have shown that even if the US had never attacked Iran, the continued global dependence on fossil fuels was resulting in trillions of dollars of avoidable costs each year, including $9.3 trillion to mitigate climate-related damages and air pollution-related deaths each year, costs that disproportionately fall on the world’s poorest.

In order to alleviate economic strain from the war, Sieber said, “governments should tax these excess profits now and use the revenues to protect people, cut bills, and rapidly deploy renewables that make households and small businesses less vulnerable to the next fossil fuel shock.”

Estimates of inflation also do not account for how the war has heightened global instability and poverty, which will require additional resources for humanitarian relief efforts. In late April, the United Nations Development Program estimated that even if the conflict had ended then, more than 32 million people worldwide would be pushed into economic precarity.

This is not to mention the resources that will need to be expended to address the harms caused by the war itself.

In exchange for negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, a portion of the memorandum of understanding requires the US to work with “regional partners,” presumably other Persian Gulf allies, to scrounge up at least $300 billion to help Iran pay for reconstruction and economic development after the country was devastated by American and Israeli attacks on civilian infrastructure and millions were displaced .

As a report from the International Rescue Committee detailed last week, the Iran war has also had cascading effects on other conflicts and catastrophes.

“Six months ago, the IRC warned that a New World Disorder was emerging,” said David Miliband, the humanitarian group’s president and CEO. “Since then, disorder has not only grown but accelerated. A war with Iran. A million people have been forced to flee their homes in Lebanon . A brewing global food security catastrophe that risks plunging millions more people into acute hunger. An expanding Ebola outbreak. Defanged diplomacy and collapsing aid budgets.”

“The Iran war couldn’t have happened at a worse time,” Miliband said in a New Yorker article published Thursday. “It set off a chain of events that’s very damaging.”

Common Dream’s work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License . Feel free to republish and share widely.

Thanks to Trump’s Iran War Disaster, Fossil Fuel Industry to Enjoy $700 Billion Windfall in 2026 added by Stephen Prager-Common Dreams on Jun 23, 2026 View all posts by Stephen Prager-Common Dreams →

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiywFBVV95cUxQYkx4U2RQcDJidDhXX01IQm5mQTJNSkFrOWNFUWpCQU1QdFowSkowenlTMDBUM1FzX2JXOEYxMWtWRlNSUV83X3lyOEZkQVhhZUFaYmZOYkhsTU5YRFFMSmlDRTNWLS1FeThXblUyVFY3YkNBemg0WHFINWQ3NHAxclhkM0dFbXZyRHRBSWw5YnJuZ0ZDZXFJUFBfMFNtWVBrNW91ZENYQVRDNVE2UWVza1c4RmZGcDdwZURwS2EwOEVXSlNsYTRfdnZvSQ?oc=5