핵심요약

• 해군 항공모함 부품은 이란 전쟁으로 인한 장기 작전으로 인해 마모 위험에 처해 있습니다.
• $220억 달러 규모의 항공모함에 대한 유지보수 시간이 길어질 것으로 예상됩니다.
• USS Lincoln은 208일 연속 항해라는 기록을 세웠으며, 이는 장기간 운용의 영향을 보여줍니다.
• 승조원 가족들은 구멍이나 온수 부족 등 시설물 노후화에 대한 우려를 표명했습니다.

도입

본 기사는 지정학적 갈등이 군사 작전의 지속성과 장비의 물리적 내구성에 미치는 영향을 분석합니다. 투자자들은 이러한 군사적 상황이 장기적인 방위 산업 계약 및 해군 예산 집행에 어떤 영향을 미칠지 주목해야 합니다. 즉, 지정학적 리스크가 실제 자산의 운영 비용과 유지보수 계획에 어떻게 반영되는지를 이해하는 것이 중요합니다.

본문 1: 장비 마모와 운영 비용의 관계

해군 항공모함의 부품들은 예상치 못한 기록적인 작전 수행으로 인해 심각한 마모를 겪고 있습니다. 기사에 따르면, 항공모함에 탑재된 배관, 공조 시스템, 비행기 이착륙을 담당하는 캐터펄트, 그리고 착륙 시 비행기를 받치는 장비 등이 마모의 대상이 되고 있습니다. 이는 단순히 미관상의 문제가 아니라, 장비의 신뢰성과 안전성을 직접적으로 위협하는 문제입니다. 특히, 운용이 강도 높게 진행될수록 정기적인 유지보수 요구량이 기하급수적으로 증가하게 됩니다. 이는 장기적으로 항공모함의 가동률과 운용 비용에 직접적인 영향을 미칩니다. 따라서, 군사 작전의 강도가 높아질수록 장비의 수명 주기 관리(Life Cycle Management)에 대한 투자가 필수적이라는 점이 핵심입니다.

본문 2: 작전 지속성과 인력의 딜레마

USS Abraham Lincoln의 사례는 이러한 물리적 마모가 승조원들의 생활 환경과 직결됨을 보여줍니다. 가족들은 특정 구역의 변기 파손이나 온수 부족과 같은 시설 문제에 대해 우려를 표명했습니다. 이는 장기간의 고강도 작전이 단순히 기계적 부품뿐만 아니라, 함정 내 인프라의 지속적인 운영 능력에도 영향을 미친다는 점을 시사합니다. 또한, 선박이 장기간 원거리에서 운용될 때, 정비 인력의 배치와 기술적 지원의 지속 가능성이라는 인적 자원 측면의 딜레마도 발생합니다. 이는 최첨단 장비를 운용하기 위해 필요한 숙련된 기술 인력의 확보와 유지보수 시스템의 효율성에 대한 전략적 질문을 던집니다. 즉, 하드웨어의 내구성과 더불어 소프트웨어 및 인력 시스템의 통합적 관리가 장기적인 작전 성공의 핵심 요소로 부상하고 있습니다.

본문 3: 장기적인 유지보수 및 전략적 시사점

이러한 마모 문제를 해결하기 위해서는 단기적인 수리뿐만 아니라, 항공모함 전체 시스템의 선제적이고 포괄적인 유지보수 계획이 필요합니다. 장기적으로는 해군이 운용하는 항공모함의 설계 및 시스템을 재검토하여, 극한 환경에서의 내구성을 높이는 방향으로 업그레이드하는 전략이 요구됩니다. 또한, 비상 상황에 대비한 모듈화된 시스템과 신속한 현장 수리 능력을 갖춘 기술 시스템을 구축하는 것이 중요합니다. 이러한 투자는 단기적인 비용 증가를 초래할 수 있으나, 장기적인 운용 안정성과 자산의 총 가치를 보존하는 데 필수적입니다. 궁극적으로, 지정학적 환경 변화에 대응하는 해군 자산의 탄력성을 확보하는 것이 미래 전략의 핵심이 될 것입니다.

결론

결론적으로, 현재의 군사적 긴장 상황은 해군 항공모함의 물리적 마모 문제를 가속화하고 있으며, 이는 막대한 유지보수 비용과 운영 위험을 수반합니다. 투자자들은 이러한 현상이 단순한 운영 비용 증가를 넘어, 해군 자산의 전략적 가치와 장기적인 유지보수 계획에 미치는 영향을 면밀히 분석해야 합니다. 향후 해군의 자산 관리 및 기술 혁신 방향에 대한 변화를 주시하는 것이 중요할 것입니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMickFVX3lxTFBGYko5UFNkN3lqWkZNUzJ5bmU5bTJkSGdwLWlIX3F2bm5JM2ZWR3ZqNVBLT25DWnFQZlJtZVJHWEZ6bTkwajdyb1ZjNHRGSTRLcG5JUnNiSy1QN0ZyNkE0R29hLUd5VkIxcTIyM2FNa2JlZw?oc=5

The Navy’s ships risk wearing out in the Iran war - MS NOW

After nearly six months in a fast-paced, unplanned war with Iran, the parts onboard the Navy’s aircraft carriers are at risk of wearing out. That includes the plumbing and air-conditioning systems, catapults that launch fighter jets and the gear that catches the planes slamming to a halt on the floating runway.  Retired senior Navy leaders are raising concerns over the wear and tear the unexpected record-breaking deployments have on the $22 billion carriers, the expensive aircraft they transport around the world and the badly needed extended maintenance time it will take to repair them. “We are excessively wearing out our ships,” said Brent Sadler, a retired Navy captain and senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation. “The longer that you’re working them hard at sea,” he said, the longer the Navy needs to put “a lot of time” into maintenance when the ships are not available for deployments. That is the challenge facing the USS Abraham Lincoln, which the Navy is preparing to rush back to its home port of San Diego after operating at a blistering tempo launching missions against Iran and protecting U.S. bases and allies in the Middle East. The USS Lincoln hit a modern-day record for most continuous days at sea, 208, without a port call and is on track to potentially surpass the longest deployment of a modern aircraft carrier that was set earlier this year by the USS Gerald R. Ford at 326 days. Family members whose sailors work on the USS Lincoln’s flight deck have told MS NOW they are worried about the damage to the arresting cables that land jets and wear and tear to the flight deck itself. Other family members said their loved ones described toilets in certain zones of the USS Lincoln being broken for extended periods of time and a lack of hot water. Family members were granted anonymity to recount sensitive conversations. Family members, according to audio and video recordings reviewed by MS NOW of a tense virtual town hall meeting in San Diego on Aug. 6, also told Navy leaders that their loved ones described air-conditioning outages and expressed concerns about potential water contamination from jet fuel onboard the Lincoln. The Lincoln “remains fully capable of meeting all mission tasking,” Cmdr. Joseph Hontz, the spokesperson for the Navy’s 5th Fleet, told MS NOW in a statement. The deployment has been “challenging for the crew and their equipment,” Hontz said, adding that the deck of the USS Lincoln has seen more than 10,000 aircraft sorties in eight months. But, Hontz said, there are no holes in the flight deck and the crew has been able to repair the expected wear and tear when needed. Lengthy deployments and delayed maintenance have a ripple effect through the fleet. In previous back-to-back extended deployments of aircraft carriers, inspection teams found equipment needed more work than anticipated, according to Bryan Clark, a retired Navy commander who worked in naval operations and is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. That unplanned work meant a longer maintenance period than planned, with repair times doubling from the normal seven or eight months to a year or year and a half. Carriers caught up in maintenance then prevent other carriers from leaving deployment for their maintenance period, extending their time at sea. It is a type of “maintenance debt” that Clark argues takes years to pay back. “You get this cascading set of delays as everybody’s waiting in line to get their turn in the dry dock or at the pier in the shipyard, which means there’s fewer carriers for deployment, and then the few carriers that are available, they get worked harder,” Clark said.  Those swelling maintenance demands lead to longer deployments, and longer deployments have been “normalized,” said the retired Navy captain Sadler. “And they should never be normalized.” The Navy office of public affairs did not return requests for comment about delayed maintenance leading to longer deployments. Typically, aircraft carriers stop at a friendly port every 30 to 45 days on a standard deployment, which is usually six to seven months long. Not only do the port calls give the sailors and Marines on the ship an opportunity to rest and for the ship to get resupplied, but it also gives engineers and mechanics, either from the uniformed crew or contractors, the chance to address any repairs or maintenance that needs to be done to keep the ship safe and efficient.  While there are several enlisted rates in the Navy from electricians to machinists to technicians who can address problems at sea, the port calls are also necessary to give the crew and the contractors more time, when the ship is not engaged in combat operations, to focus on any bigger issues. According to U.S. Navy 2026 Fighting Instructions from the Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle, the Navy’s 300 ships should be following the rules of thirds: “Every day, around a third are deployed, and another third are in deep maintenance. The last third are neither deployed nor in maintenance. In theory, this group is either in the workup phase (training, readying to deploy) or the sustainment phase (post-deployment, maintaining a ready state).” At any given time, anywhere from three to four of the Navy’s 11 aircraft carriers are deployable, which means they have finished their maintenance and training periods and are ready to be utilized at sea. Already, four different aircraft carriers have been used to support Trump’s war with Iran. The USS Ford and the USS Lincoln were in the Middle East when the United States first launched airstrikes on Iran on Feb. 28.  Later, the USS George H.W. Bush deployed to the region to relieve the USS Ford, and now the USS George Washington is moving toward the waters off Iran to potentially relieve the USS Lincoln. Navy leaders have maintained that the U.S. needs at least two aircraft carriers in the Middle East to support the airstrikes on Iran and impose the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Utilizing so many aircraft carriers for one mission has caused the Indo-Pacific region to be left without a carrier as the USS Washington has now been sent from Japan to potentially relieve the beleaguered USS Lincoln.  While this has happened in the past, former Navy leaders warn that it is leaving the U.S. and its regional Asian allies vulnerable to potential threats from China, Russia and North Korea. Having an aircraft carrier based in Japan, which the U.S. has had since 1973, allows it to respond to the region 17 days faster than if it sent an aircraft carrier from the U.S. The Navy has plans to add aircraft carriers to the fleet. But it takes anywhere from 10 to 15 years to order, design, procure and construct an aircraft carrier, so building up the fleet will take time.  The Navy has authorized three additional Ford-class aircraft carriers that have not begun construction: the USS Doris Miller, the USS William J Clinton and the USS George W. Bush. There are also two more aircraft carriers that are currently under construction, the USS Enterprise and the USS John F. Kennedy. “If Congress members are serious about trying to do better for the sailors, they need more ships. It’s as simple as that,” said Sadler. “Because the world is a very dangerous place, getting more dangerous.”

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMickFVX3lxTFBGYko5UFNkN3lqWkZNUzJ5bmU5bTJkSGdwLWlIX3F2bm5JM2ZWR3ZqNVBLT25DWnFQZlJtZVJHWEZ6bTkwajdyb1ZjNHRGSTRLcG5JUnNiSy1QN0ZyNkE0R29hLUd5VkIxcTIyM2FNa2JlZw?oc=5