핵심요약

• 코로나19 팬데믹이 공급망 붕괴 속도 가속화
• 우크라이나 전쟁으로 식량, 에너지, 상품 시장 구조 재편
• 홍해 긴장사태로 무역로 전략적 중요성 부각
• 기술 제한, 제재, 수출 통제 등 경제적 압박 수단 다양화
• MENA 지역이 글로벌 경제 충격에 취약한 지리적 위치

도입

이 기사는 투자자에게 MENA 지역의 경제적 취약성을 이해하고, 글로벌 경제 안보 전략을 재검토할 필요성을 강조합니다. 특히 지역이 글로벌 무역로와 에너지 시장의 교차점에 위치한 만큼, 경제적 충격에 대한 대비가 국가 안보의 핵심 요소로 부상하고 있다는 점을 강조합니다.

본문 1: 글로벌 공급망의 취약성

최근 3년간 코로나19 팬데믹이 공급망에 미친 영향은 극명했습니다. 특히 반도체, 식량, 에너지 분야에서 공급망의 취약성이 드러났으며, 이는 MENA 지역에서도 동일한 패턴을 보였습니다. 예를 들어, 반도체 공급망의 단절은 지역 내 기술 제품 생산에 직접적인 영향을 미쳤습니다. 이는 공급망 다각화가 더욱 중요해졌다는 것을 의미합니다.

본문 2: 에너지 시장 구조의 변화

우크라이나 전쟁은 에너지 시장의 구조를 근본적으로 바꿨습니다. 특히 MENA 지역은 에너지 수출에 크게 의존하는 국가들이 많아, 에너지 가격의 변동성이 경제 안정에 미치는 영향이 커졌습니다. 이는 에너지 시장 안정화를 위한 정책적 대응이 필요함을 시사합니다. 또한, 재생에너지 투자의 확대도 에너지 시장 구조 변화를 가속화할 것입니다.

본문 3: 무역로의 전략적 중요성

홍해 긴장사태는 무역로의 전략적 중요성을 다시 한 번 강조했습니다. MENA 지역은 글로벌 무역의 30%가 통과하는 중요한 무역로를 보유하고 있어, 이 지역의 안정성은 글로벌 경제에 직접적인 영향을 미칩니다. 이는 무역로의 안전을 확보하기 위한 국제적 협력이 필요함을 보여줍니다.

결론

이 기사는 MENA 지역의 경제 안보가 국가 안보의 핵심 요소로 부상하고 있음을 강조합니다. 특히 글로벌 공급망의 취약성, 에너지 시장 구조의 변화, 무역로의 전략적 중요성이 강조되었습니다. 향후 MENA 지역은 경제 안보를 강화하기 위한 정책적 대응이 필요할 것입니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixAFBVV95cUxPTVV6VzZ0MHd1SFljbnhkUWFlc3BaSnZyaUoyUVdMX29fQ2VhZG5Tc25oX0xhbVpfZXdoM2YxNlRPUFl4d2RFeHZPcGItU0EyMmM4RTlzMTZ5UmE3U09qWWlfQl81Rmt3M01XVzdqdTdtWlF6RUFiQm9YcXJLR052Qzc3MEtKc1Q1YnR3WmZyb2Z5RS1qWGdPRHk3SGN6Wk1fbHE1NDkzdGNZNDhaS3lxYXJvNGtQLXp1LThIY0Q0cXdudWxZ?oc=5

Economic security is the new national security: Why MENA must prepare before the next shock - Economy Middle East

Published: Mon 29 Jun 2026, 3:39 PM

The next national crisis may not begin with a military confrontation. It may begin with a disrupted shipping lane, a cyberattack on critical infrastructure, a sudden restriction on food exports, a payment system outage, a shortage of semiconductors, or a sharp increase in energy prices. In an interconnected but increasingly fragmented world, the economy has become one of the most important arenas of power, pressure and strategic competition.

For the Middle East and North Africa, this reality is not theoretical. It is immediate, visible and deeply connected to the region’s development future. MENA sits at the crossroads of global energy markets, maritime trade routes, food import corridors, financial flows, migration pressures and geopolitical tensions. It is a region where global disruptions quickly become domestic policy challenges. For decades, economic policy across the world was largely designed around the logic of efficiency and comparative advantage. Countries were encouraged to produce where costs were lowest, import where goods were cheapest, integrate into global value chains and trust that open markets would continue to function smoothly. This model supported growth, reduced costs and deepened global interdependence. Yet the same model also created hidden vulnerabilities. What looked efficient in normal times often became fragile in moments of disruption.

Recent global shocks have exposed this reality with unusual clarity. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed how quickly supply chains could break. The war in Ukraine reshaped food, energy and commodity markets. Tensions around the Red Sea and other maritime routes reminded the world that trade corridors are not merely logistical passages; they are strategic lifelines. Technology restrictions, sanctions, export controls and financial measures have made it clear that access to markets, data, platforms, currencies and critical technologies can no longer be taken for granted.

For MENA countries, these shocks intersect with existing structural pressures. Many economies in the region face high dependence on food imports, severe water scarcity, youth employment challenges, fiscal pressures, climate vulnerability and exposure to external financing conditions. Some are energy exporters navigating the global energy transition. Others are energy importers struggling with price volatility. Some are financial and logistics hubs. Others are conflict-affected or debt-constrained economies. Yet across these differences, one lesson is shared: economic resilience has become a strategic necessity.

This is why economic security can no longer be treated as a narrow technical file. It is not only about growth rates, inflation, fiscal balances, or trade figures. These indicators remain important, but they do not tell the full story. A country may appear economically stable while being deeply exposed to a single supplier, shipping route, technology provider, food source, or external financial channel. In times of crisis, these dependencies can become pressure points.

Economic security is therefore about a state’s capacity to function under stress. It is about whether a country can feed its population, power its economy, protect its financial system, secure its data, maintain access to critical technologies and make sovereign decisions even under external pressure. It is the bridge between economic policy and national resilience.

In MENA, food security is perhaps the clearest example. Food is not only a humanitarian need or a consumer good. It is a strategic asset. Many countries in the region depend heavily on imported grains and global food markets. When conflict, climate shocks, export restrictions, currency depreciation, or shipping disruptions occur, the impact is quickly felt in household budgets and public policy. Bread, wheat and basic food prices are not only economic variables; they are social and political signals.

Water security is another defining issue. MENA is one of the world’s most water-stressed regions, and climate change is intensifying the pressure. Water scarcity affects agriculture, food security, public health, energy production, urban planning and social stability. In this context, water is not a sectoral concern. It is part of the region’s national security equation.

Energy security adds another layer of complexity. For energy-exporting countries, the challenge is no longer only how to manage oil and gas revenues, but how to finance diversification, prepare for the energy transition, and remain globally competitive in a changing market. For energy-importing countries, the challenges include price exposure, subsidy pressures, foreign-currency needs and the vulnerability of households and industries to external shocks. Across the region, energy policy is now inseparable from industrial, climate, fiscal, and foreign policy.

Technology has also become a major pillar of economic security. Artificial intelligence, cloud systems, digital platforms, semiconductors, cybersecurity and data infrastructure are now deeply embedded in national capacity. They shape productivity, defense, finance, education, health, public administration and innovation. If countries in MENA want to compete in the future economy, they must not only consume technology. They must build digital capabilities, protect data, strengthen cybersecurity and reduce excessive dependence on external systems in critical areas.

The same applies to critical minerals and industrial inputs. The global transition toward renewable energy, electric vehicles, advanced manufacturing and digital infrastructure depends on resources and supply chains that are often geographically concentrated and geopolitically sensitive. This means that the green transition itself is not free from strategic pressure. MENA countries seeking to lead in renewable energy, green hydrogen, logistics, advanced manufacturing, or clean technology will need secure supply chains, regional partnerships and long-term industrial strategies.

At the same time, economic wars have become more frequent and more sophisticated. Sanctions, secondary sanctions, trade barriers, export controls, investment restrictions, financial exclusion, technology bans and currency pressures are now standard tools of international politics. They allow states to apply pressure without using military force. The battlefield is no longer only territorial. It is financial, technological, commercial, logistical and digital. This is particularly important for MENA because the region is deeply connected to global finance, energy markets, trade corridors and geopolitical alliances. Economic pressure applied elsewhere can quickly be transmitted to the region through commodity prices, investor sentiment, remittances, tourism, exchange rates, capital flows and supply chains. In such an environment, vulnerability is not always direct. It can arrive through second-round effects.

This shift changes the responsibilities of policymakers. Traditional economic management is no longer enough. Ministries of economy, finance, trade, energy, agriculture, industry, digital transformation and foreign affairs cannot operate in separate silos. Economic security requires coordination across government, the private sector, central banks, regulators, ports, logistics providers, technology companies, research institutions and international partners. It requires a whole-of-state and whole-of-economy approach.

The key question is no longer only “how can MENA economies grow faster?” It is also: how can they absorb shocks better? How can they reduce dangerous dependencies? How can they protect critical sectors without closing their economies? How can they diversify suppliers while maintaining efficiency? How can they prepare for disruptions before they become crises?

This requires a move from reactive crisis management to strategic preparedness. Many governments respond only after a shock has already occurred. But in the age of economic wars, a late reaction is costly. Countries need early-warning systems that monitor global risks before they hit domestic markets. These systems should track food prices, shipping disruptions, energy volatility, technology restrictions, financial sanctions, cyber threats, debt vulnerabilities, climate risks and concentration in critical imports. Scenario planning is equally important. Governments should regularly ask: what happens if a major maritime route is disrupted? What happens if global wheat prices rise sharply? What happens if energy prices double? What happens if a major technology supplier becomes unavailable? What happens if global interest rates remain high? What happens if a cyberattack targets ports, banks, energy grids, hospitals, or public services?

These questions are not academic exercises. They are essential tools of state preparedness. They allow decision-makers to identify vulnerabilities, test response options and prepare institutions before the crisis arrives. A resilient state is not one that avoids all shocks. No country can do that. A resilient state is one that can anticipate, absorb, adapt and recover. Strategic reserves are part of this preparedness, but they are not enough. Stockpiles of food, fuel, medicine, or critical inputs can provide short-term protection, yet long-term economic security requires deeper structural resilience. This includes diversified trade partners, domestic productive capacity in selected strategic areas, stronger regional cooperation, investment in logistics infrastructure, digital security, climate adaptation and stronger public-private coordination.

MENA also needs to think regionally. No country can secure food, water, energy, technology and logistics alone. Regional cooperation can help build shared reserves, coordinated emergency mechanisms, stronger transport corridors, joint investment platforms, agricultural partnerships, renewable energy grids, and knowledge-sharing systems. Economic security in the region should not be seen only as a national agenda; it is also a regional public good.

The private sector has a central role. Companies understand supply chains, market risks, technology needs, logistics constraints and operational vulnerabilities. Governments should not design economic security strategies without them. At the same time, firms should not treat resilience as a purely private cost. In strategic sectors, private disruption can become a national risk. This makes partnership essential.

Economic security also has a social dimension. When shocks occur, the burden often falls hardest on households, workers, small businesses and vulnerable communities. Food inflation, job losses, energy costs, currency pressures and supply shortages can quickly become social and political challenges. Therefore, resilience must include social protection, targeted support, job creation and communication strategies that maintain public trust. This is particularly important for MENA’s young population. Economic security should not be reduced to defensive policies. It should also be linked to opportunity: future jobs, digital skills, green industries, entrepreneurship, local production, research capacity and human development. A secure economy is not only one that survives shocks. It is one that gives its people confidence in the future.

However, economic security should not be confused with isolationism. The answer is not to withdraw from the global economy or build walls around national markets. No country can produce everything alone, and no modern economy can thrive in isolation. The real objective is intelligent openness: engaging with the world while understanding risks, diversifying dependencies, building domestic capacity where necessary and protecting the systems that matter most. This is the essence of the strategic state. A strategic state does not simply react to global events. It reads signals early, understands interdependencies, prepares for uncertainty and coordinates national capabilities. It knows which sectors are critical, where dependencies are concentrated, which risks are acceptable and which vulnerabilities require urgent action. It links economic analysis to national decision-making.

Read| The quiet transformation of finance: Real-time, embedded, invisible

For MENA, the strategic state must also be a developmental state. It must connect economic security with diversification, human capital, climate resilience, digital transformation, industrial upgrading, and social inclusion. Resilience should not be an emergency-only agenda. It should be built into national development plans, fiscal frameworks, investment strategies, education systems, and regional cooperation platforms.

In the coming years, the countries that succeed will not necessarily be those with the lowest costs or the fastest growth alone. They will be the countries that combine competitiveness with resilience. They will be able to trade, innovate, attract investment, and integrate globally, while also protecting their strategic sectors and maintaining room for sovereign decision-making.

Economic security is not a temporary concern created by recent crises. It is the new foundation of national security in the twenty-first century. It requires new institutions, new data systems, new partnerships and a new policy mindset. The world has moved from an era that rewarded efficiency above all else to an era that demands resilience, adaptability and preparedness. Growth still matters. Openness still matters. Global cooperation still matters. But they must now be balanced with strategic awareness.

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixAFBVV95cUxPTVV6VzZ0MHd1SFljbnhkUWFlc3BaSnZyaUoyUVdMX29fQ2VhZG5Tc25oX0xhbVpfZXdoM2YxNlRPUFl4d2RFeHZPcGItU0EyMmM4RTlzMTZ5UmE3U09qWWlfQl81Rmt3M01XVzdqdTdtWlF6RUFiQm9YcXJLR052Qzc3MEtKc1Q1YnR3WmZyb2Z5RS1qWGdPRHk3SGN6Wk1fbHE1NDkzdGNZNDhaS3lxYXJvNGtQLXp1LThIY0Q0cXdudWxZ?oc=5