트럼프 행정부, '대규모 환적 사기'로 무역 전쟁 새로운 전선 개척
New reactionary Trump measures to intensify trade war - World Socialist Web Site
새로운 무역 전쟁 조치에 대한 불확실성이 전반적인 변동성과 위험 회피 심리를 증가시키고 있습니다.
핵심 요약
미국은 40개 주요 교역국을 포함한 국가들을 대상으로 중국산 상품의 불법적인 환적을 비난하며 새로운 무역 전략을 추진하고 있습니다.
핵심요약
- '대규모 환적 사기(The Great Transshipment Scam)'라는 새로운 무역 전선이 개척됨.
- 미국은 캐나다, EU, 인도, 일본 등 40개 주요 교역국을 포함한 국가들을 대상으로 무역 규제를 강화하고 있음.
- 브라질, 인도네시아, 베트남 등 물류 역량을 가진 국가들이 중국 연관 물품의 환적에 핵심적인 역할을 수행함.
- 캄보디아, 라오스 등 다수의 국가가 중국 연관 우회 경로에 매력적인 목표가 되고 있음.
도입
본 기사는 트럼프 행정부가 제기한 '대규모 환적 사기'라는 새로운 무역 전략이 글로벌 경제 및 공급망에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 데 중요합니다. 이는 단순한 관세 부과를 넘어, 국가 간의 무역 흐름과 물류 인프라에 대한 지정학적 경쟁이 심화되고 있음을 시사합니다. 투자자들은 이러한 변화가 특정 산업의 생산 비용, 공급망 안정성, 그리고 각국의 경제적 위치에 따라 어떻게 다르게 반영될지 면밀히 살펴볼 필요가 있습니다.
본문 1: 무역 전쟁의 새로운 프레임: 환적 사기의 실체
트럼프 행정부가 제시한 이 '대규모 환적 사기' 주장의 핵심은 중국산 상품이 관세 부담을 회피하기 위해 제3국을 거쳐 미국 시장에 유입되는 불법적인 물류 경로를 지적하는 데 있습니다. 피터 나바로(Peter Navarro)는 이 사기가 중국이 수출을 세탁하고 미국 세금을 회피하며 미국 노동자들의 임금을 훔치는 수단이라고 주장합니다. 이 주장의 근거는 전 세계가 미국에 대항하는 거대한 음모에 연루되어 있다는 인식에 기반하고 있습니다. 특히, 40개 주요 교역국과 더불어 브라질, 인도네시아, 베트남 등 물류 역량을 가진 국가들이 이 과정에 깊이 관여하고 있다는 점은, 무역 정책이 이제 관세 수준뿐만 아니라 복잡한 국제 물류 및 공급망의 투명성 문제로 확장되고 있음을 보여줍니다. 이는 각국이 자국의 물류 인프라를 활용하여 지정학적 이점을 확보하려는 경쟁 구도로 해석됩니다.
본문 2: 공급망의 재편과 지정학적 리스크
이러한 환적 사기의 구도는 글로벌 공급망의 근본적인 재편을 촉진하고 있습니다. 중국 중심의 공급망에서 벗어나려는 각국은 자국의 산업 규모와 항만 용량을 활용하여 새로운 무역 경로를 확보하려 합니다. 이는 단순히 관세율을 조정하는 것을 넘어, 특정 국가들의 경제적 위치가 글로벌 무역 흐름을 결정하는 핵심 변수가 됨을 의미합니다. 예를 들어, 인도, 인도네시아, 태국과 같은 동남아시아 및 남미 국가들이 물류 허브로서의 역할을 강화하면서, 미국과 중국 간의 경제적 상호작용이 이들 중개국을 통해 더욱 복잡하게 얽히게 됩니다. 이러한 흐름은 특정 국가들의 경제적 안정성과 물류 인프라에 대한 의존도를 변화시키며, 잠재적인 지정학적 리스크를 증폭시키는 요인으로 작용합니다.
본문 3: 장기적 관점에서의 시장 전망
장기적으로 볼 때, 이러한 환적 사기의 확산은 글로벌 무역 시스템의 파편화와 블록화 추세를 가속화할 가능성이 높습니다. 각국은 자국 중심의 공급망(Friend-shoring 또는 Near-shoring)을 구축하려 할 것이며, 이는 특정 국가들의 경제적 영향력을 재분배하는 결과를 낳을 것입니다. 따라서 투자자들은 단기적인 관세 변동성보다는, 물류 인프라 투자, 공급망 다변화에 성공적으로 참여하는 국가 및 기업에 주목해야 합니다. 특히, 물류 및 해운 산업 관련 인프라에 대한 투자가 장기적인 성장 동력이 될 것으로 전망됩니다.
결론
결론적으로, 새로운 무역 전쟁의 프레임은 관세 전쟁을 넘어선 복잡한 글로벌 물류 및 공급망 경쟁으로 진화하고 있습니다. 각국이 물류 역량을 활용하여 무역 이점을 확보하려는 움직임은 글로벌 경제의 구조적 변화를 예고합니다. 향후 투자 환경은 이러한 지정학적 경쟁 속에서 공급망의 회복탄력성과 물류 인프라의 효율성에 따라 결정될 가능성이 높습니다. 따라서 시장은 물류 및 생산 거점의 변화에 민감하게 반응할 것으로 예상됩니다.
Original Article
New reactionary Trump measures to intensify trade war - World Socialist Web Site
The Trump administration is seeking to open a new front in its global trade war by accusing a wide range of countries of participating in schemes to allow Chinese goods into the US at a lower rate of tariff than they would otherwise be charged.
The new initiative is set out in a document issued by the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy earlier this month, entitled “The Great Transshipment Scam.” In a crude attempt to link up with interest in the Christopher Nolan movie Odyssey the document features a Trojan-style wooden horse on the front cover.
The department is headed by the rabid anti-China hawk Peter Navarro.
Commenting in the report he said: “For years, the great transshipment scam has let communist China launder its exports to more than 40 countries, rob our Treasury of billions of dollars and steal the pay cheques of billions of American workers.”
The basis of the report is that virtually the entire world is somehow involved in a giant conspiracy against the US.
The 40 countries pointed to by Navarro include the major trading partners of the US such as Canada, the European Union, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and Taiwan.
But there is a second tier, according to the document, which combine integration into China-linked supply chains with significant illegal transshipment volumes. These include Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Turkey and Vietnam. These countries “possess sufficient industrial scale, port capacity, supplier infrastructure, manufacturing depth of logistics capacity to move significant volume of China-linked goods into US-bound trade flows.”
And there are more. A third tier, which contains the largest number of countries—Cambodia, Laos, Panama, Costa Rica are named among many others—which have capacities which made them “attractive opportunistic targets for China-linked rerouting.”
Reading the report, it is hard to think of a country which is not part of a supposed giant China-organised global operation against the US.
At first glance it might appear that the report is the expression of some kind of madness. But there is an underlying logic and economic reality.
The driving force of the US railing against a giant Chinese conspiracy is the vast change in the structure of the global economy over the past 40 years. This is the development of a highly integrated global production system with complex transportation, communication, and financial interconnections which has undermined previous US economic supremacy.
Navarro is just one of the more extreme expressions of the thinking in key sections of the US ruling class that its economic decline must be countered by all means available, including tariffs, financial sanctions and war, above all against China, which is being actively prepared.
The document is based on the big lie which sits at very centre of US tariff policy—that tariffs are an impost on the exporter, rather than a tax paid by the importer in the US, which is often then passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices.
That fiction has been exposed by official US facts and figures. When he imposed so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on virtually every country in the world in April 2025, Trump claimed they would be paid for by foreign countries and corporations which would provide hundreds of billions of dollars for the US Treasury, possibly even making income tax unnecessary.
As recently as his 2026 State of the Union address, he declared: “As time goes by, I believe that tariffs, paid for by foreign countries will, like in the past, substantially replace the modern-day system of income tax, taking a great financial burden off the people I love.”
Shortly after that, the Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs were illegal under the legislation through which they were imposed. But while the case went through the US courts, it was ruled they could be collected until a final determination was made.
The result of the decision has meant that US firms, which actually paid the taxes, not foreign countries or corporations, are legally entitled to a refund. And large amounts of money have already been paid, above all to major US companies.
Apple has received $2.2 billion, Nike $986 billion, FedEx around $800 million, Amazon $640 million and General Motors $500 million, with more to come.
According to a report in the Wall Street Journal , where these figures were published, US Customs and Border Protections has received “just over 252,000 refund applications as of July 31 for tariffs declared illegal by the Supreme Court” and had accepted for processing claims amounting to $128.7 billion.
The Trump regime, however, has not abandoned its tariff war but has put in place a patchwork network to continue it. But this has exacerbated what it designates the transshipment scam.
According to the report: “Transshipment is driven by exporters taking advantage of differences in US tariff treatments across countries.” In other words where transshipment does take place it has been facilitated by the nature of the Trump’s application of tariffs.
They are higher for some countries, above all China, and lower for others and have been imposed under different pieces of legislation, sometimes applying to all goods from a given country and at times applying to specific products whatever their country of origin.
Tariffs do have an effect on exporters to the US but only inasmuch as they raise the price for their products, not because the exporters pay the tariff as Trump and his acolytes continually insist.
And the report itself acknowledges what it sees as the problem of transshipment has been created by the policies of the administration itself, noting that the net effect of the administration’s policies on illegal transshipment “remains unresolved” and that “tariff differentials increase the incentive to illegally transship.”
It is doubtful that a more chaotic trade and tariff policy has ever been devised. But its contradictions—creating an illegality where none existed before—do not spring from the fevered brains of Trump and members of his administration but from the fact their policies are in the deepest historical sense reactionary.
That is, they are advanced on the basis of a nationalist economic agenda, trying to secure the maintenance of American economic hegemony, under conditions where the foundations on which the nation-state system and US hegemony rested have been swept aside by the development of globalised production.
A commodity can no longer be stamped as made in China, made in Germany, made in the US or any other country but is the product of global labour—the integration of high-tech developments, manufacture of components, the assembly of final products into a unified system of production.
These objective developments, rooted in the development of the productive forces themselves, make clear not only the possibility of a planned world socialist economy but its necessity for the resolution of the contradictions of the capitalist system because the response of the Trump regime is to double down on its irrational and reactionary agenda.
The final section of the Navarro report is entitled “The AI Detective Border: A Global Warning.”
Significantly, it links the work of the Customs and Border Protection department to the events of 9/11—the pretext used for the “war on terror”—when its predecessor set up a system to track cargo, travellers and identity “national security threats.”