지정학적 갈등이 에너지 시장에 미치는 구조적 영향

미국과 이란 간의 군사적 충돌은 단순한 군사적 충돌을 넘어 글로벌 에너지 시장의 구조적 취약성을 드러냅니다. 핵심은 호르무즈 해협의 통제권에 대한 긴장입니다. 이 해협은 전 세계 원유 및 에너지 수송의 약 20% 이상이 지나가는 전략적 요충지이므로, 이 지역의 불안정성은 즉각적으로 에너지 가격에 반영됩니다. 2026년 2월 28일 이후의 상황은 이러한 해상 통로의 안전성에 대한 불확실성을 증폭시키며, 이는 국제 유가에 직접적인 상승 압력으로 작용합니다. 이는 에너지 자원에 대한 접근성이 제한될 경우 발생하는 공급 충격 리스크를 반영합니다.

이러한 에너지 리스크는 단순히 유가에 국한되지 않고, 전 세계적인 인플레이션 압력으로 전이됩니다. 에너지 비용 증가는 생산 비용 상승을 유발하고, 이는 최종 소비재 가격 상승으로 이어져 거시 경제 전반에 걸쳐 인플레이션을 심화시킵니다. 따라서 에너지 시장의 변동성은 경제 성장률과 소비 심리에 직접적인 영향을 미치며, 이는 금융 시장의 위험 선호도에 영향을 미칩니다.

역사적 개입의 패턴이 현재 리스크에 미치는 함의

본 갈등의 배경에는 과거 미국이 이란 정부에 대해 수행했던 일련의 외교적, 군사적 개입의 역사적 패턴이 존재합니다. 1953년 이란의 총리 제거를 포함한 과거의 개입 사례들은 현재의 갈등이 단기적인 이념 대립을 넘어선 권력 역학 관계의 재현임을 시사합니다. 이러한 역사적 맥락은 현재의 갈등이 단순한 이란 내부 문제가 아니라, 미국의 지정학적 목표와 지역 세력 간의 복잡한 경쟁 구도 속에서 발생하고 있음을 의미합니다. 이는 현재의 갈등이 외교적 해법보다는 군사적 대리전의 연장선상에 놓여 있을 가능성을 높입니다.

이러한 역사적 패턴은 현재 이란을 둘러싼 지역 갈등, 즉 이스라엘과 헤즈볼라고 간의 충돌이나 예멘의 후티 반군 활동과 같은 대리전 양상에 그대로 투영됩니다. 미국은 과거와 마찬가지로 이 지역에서 영향력을 행사하려 하며, 이는 지역 내 세력 간의 균형을 더욱 불안정하게 만듭니다. 이러한 다층적인 갈등은 지역 안정성을 저해하고, 국제 무역로의 안전성을 위협하며, 궁극적으로 글로벌 경제의 불확실성을 증대시키는 요인이 됩니다.

장기적 전망 및 투자 시사점

장기적인 관점에서 볼 때, 이 갈등의 결과는 중동 지역의 정치적 안정성과 국제 에너지 공급망의 재편에 깊이 연관되어 있습니다. 에너지 공급의 불안정성은 장기적인 인플레이션 압력을 유지시킬 수 있으며, 이는 장기적인 경제 성장에 부정적인 영향을 미칩니다. 따라서 투자자들은 단기적인 군사적 소식보다는, 미국과 이란 간의 외교적 관계 변화와 중동 지역의 세력 균형 변화를 추적해야 합니다. 에너지 자원 및 지정학적 리스크에 노출된 포트폴리오에 대한 리스크 관리 전략을 재검토하는 것이 중요합니다. 구조적 리스크를 이해하고 장기적인 관점에서 접근하는 것이 현명한 투자 접근 방식이 될 것입니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi3AFBVV95cUxNeTZHLXJVX1dvdk9fR2hWYmNQRlZNUnNEUWxacV90dUZOLVNuX0loRktDTVhickJXRk4wb2Q4T0NROWJyQVVlQTU0QlpGRUdUbFZFckJwZkJYVmtEd1I3RHZTS2dxVlNxUXFEQXljVlNXYzJaMFZLcHNzUDRNdkJvVEgwbXpwUnc4LVVTdDk0Z281N2xMZGhHXy1yRFdmVmphUXJQSXZTemhMY3dkWExHQ25mX182bVVwbjJGUkREaHBjLXluM0tzQ0NsWTJjTXhKTldlS0pET1hFc0ox?oc=5

US-Iran Conflict Escalates Amidst Historical Interventions - Ratopati

More than seven decades after the United States helped remove Iran's elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh from power, the US and Iran are once again facing each other. The ongoing war between Washington and Tehran began on February 28, 2026, when the US and Israel launched airstrikes on various regions of Iran. The US and Israel claimed the strikes were in response to Iran nearing the final stages of nuclear weapon development.

During this war, Iran has been retaliating in various countries in the Gulf region. Israel is also conducting military operations in Lebanon, targeting what it claims are Hezbollah strongholds supported by Iran. Meanwhile, in Yemen, Iran-backed Houthi rebels are targeting ships associated with Saudi Arabia in the Red Sea.

This conflict has also severely impacted the global energy market. Concerns over oil and energy supply have increased following the closure of the crucial waterway, the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts to end the war have also stalled.

The recent US-Israel war on Iran is another chapter in the long-standing tense relationship between Washington and Tehran. The relationship between these two countries has been shaped by past attempts at regime change, covert military and political operations, economic sanctions, military clashes, and failed diplomatic efforts.

Since the Islamic Revolution led by Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, which ousted the US-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Washington has repeatedly attempted to weaken Tehran's government.

However, Iran is not the only example. From Guatemala and Cuba to Chile and Venezuela, the US has intervened against governments it deemed contrary to its interests at various times.

What was achieved through those efforts? And what lessons can Washington learn from them now?

In 1953, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in collaboration with Britain, helped remove Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh from power.

Mosaddegh had been Prime Minister since 1951. After he nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, Western powers, including Britain and the US, became dissatisfied. In their view, the nationalization of the oil industry was against Western economic and strategic interests. Following the coup, Shah Pahlavi returned to power.

Iran's last Shah, Pahlavi, first took leadership of the country during World War II in 1941. Prior to that, his father, Reza Shah, was forced to abdicate after British and Soviet forces invaded Iran.

At that time, Britain and the Soviet Union were concerned about Reza Shah's ties to Nazi Germany. Germany was Iran's main trading partner. Additionally, the Allied powers wanted to use Iran's land and railways to strengthen their own war efforts.

For about 25 years after the 1953 coup against Mosaddegh, Iran under Pahlavi's leadership and the US were close friends. The US strongly supported the Shah. It even assisted in developing Iran's civilian nuclear program. In 1957, under US President Dwight Eisenhower's 'Atoms for Peace' program, the two countries signed a nuclear cooperation agreement. A decade later, the US provided Iran with nuclear reactors and uranium.

Over time, the Shah's rule became increasingly autocratic, which also increased opposition within the country. In 1979, widespread public demonstrations forced the Shah to step down. Subsequently, Ruhollah Khomeini, who was in exile, returned to Iran and established the Islamic Republic.

This marked a complete deterioration in US-Iran relations. Iran, once a close ally of the US, became one of its main adversaries.

On November 4, 1979, Iranian students seized the US embassy in Tehran and took 52 American citizens hostage. They were held for 444 days. Following this, the US severed diplomatic ties with Iran and imposed sanctions on Tehran.

During the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, the US supported Iraq. Direct military clashes also occurred between Iranian and US forces during this period.

In the following decade, the US continued to impose more sanctions on Iran. Sanctions were tightened, citing Iran's nuclear activities and its support for armed groups like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

After the September 11 terrorist attacks, US President George W. Bush declared Iran part of the 'Axis of Evil'. However, prior to this, the US and Iran had cooperated on some issues against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

After a long period of tension, new possibilities for diplomatic dialogue emerged between the two countries during the tenure of US President Barack Obama. In 2015, Iran and major world powers, including the US, Britain, France, and China, reached a nuclear agreement called the 'Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action' (JCPOA).

Under the agreement, Iran accepted certain limits on its nuclear activities. In return, some economic sanctions against Iran were to be lifted.

However, this agreement did not last long. US President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the agreement in his first term in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Iran.

A year later, Iran began enriching uranium beyond the limits set in the agreement. It was estimated that Iran eventually accumulated about 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium.

In 2025, after being re-elected president, Trump proposed new nuclear talks with Iran. Talks also began with mediation from Oman. However, these talks collapsed after Israel attacked Iran, initiating a 12-day war. The US then joined the war and attacked three Iranian nuclear facilities.

On February 28, 2026, the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran again. This time, the attacks occurred amidst nuclear negotiations.

US President Trump stated that one of the main objectives of the war was regime change in Tehran. He presented this in connection with the 'freedom' of the Iranian people.

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi3AFBVV95cUxNeTZHLXJVX1dvdk9fR2hWYmNQRlZNUnNEUWxacV90dUZOLVNuX0loRktDTVhickJXRk4wb2Q4T0NROWJyQVVlQTU0QlpGRUdUbFZFckJwZkJYVmtEd1I3RHZTS2dxVlNxUXFEQXljVlNXYzJaMFZLcHNzUDRNdkJvVEgwbXpwUnc4LVVTdDk0Z281N2xMZGhHXy1yRFdmVmphUXJQSXZTemhMY3dkWExHQ25mX182bVVwbjJGUkREaHBjLXluM0tzQ0NsWTJjTXhKTldlS0pET1hFc0ox?oc=5