US지정학·Google News RSS: Israel Iran Conflict·

미국-이란 긴장 고조…호르무즈 해협 통제권 다툼

Iran again asserts control over Strait of Hormuz after Trump's Truth Social annihilation threat - SBS Australia

2026.06.28 20:27 번역됨
AI 감성 분석
중립
롱 53%숏 47%

호르무즈 해협의 지opolitical 긴장로 인해 원유 시장에 대한 불확실성이 증가하고 있습니다.

핵심 요약

미국-이란 긴장 고조…트럼프가 이란 멸망 위협, 미국이 10개 군사 목표물 타격

핵심요약

  • 미국 대통령 트럼프가 '이란이 존재하지 않게 될 것'이라고 위협하며 군사 행동을 예고
  • 이란 아바스 아라그치 장관이 새로운 안보 틀을 제안하며 호르무즈 해협 개방 지연 경고
  • 미국 중앙사령부가 10개의 이란 군사 목표물을 타격, 200만 배럴의 원유를 실은 유조선에 대한 이란의 무인기 공격에 대응
  • 호르무즈 해협은 세계에서 가장 중요한 석유 수송 경로 중 하나

도입

이번 기사에서 미국과 이란 간의 긴장이 다시 고조되고 있는 상황을 확인할 수 있습니다. 특히, 호르무즈 해협이라는 전략적으로 중요한 해협의 통제권 다툼이 주목받고 있습니다. 이 지역은 세계 석유 수송의 30% 이상이 통과하는 중요한 해협으로, 그 변동성이 글로벌 에너지 시장에 미치는 영향을 고려할 때, 투자자들에게는 매우 중요한 이슈입니다.

본문 1: 호르무즈 해협의 전략적 중요성

호르무즈 해협은 세계 석유 수송의 30% 이상이 통과하는 중요한 해협입니다. 이 지역의 불안정성은 글로벌 에너지 시장에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 특히, 이란과 미국 간의 긴장이 고조되면서 호르무즈 해협의 통제권 다툼이 더욱 부각되고 있습니다. 이번 미국 중앙사령부의 10개 군사 목표물 타격은 이란의 군사적 도발에 대한 강경한 대응으로 해석될 수 있습니다. 이는 호르무즈 해협의 안정성에 대한 우려를 높이고, 에너지 시장의 변동성을 증가시킬 가능성이 있습니다.

본문 2: 군사적 대응의 경제적 영향

미국과 이란 간의 군사적 대응은 글로벌 에너지 시장에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 특히, 호르무즈 해협의 통제권 다툼은 석유 수송에 직접적인 영향을 미치며, 이는 원유 가격의 급등으로 이어질 수 있습니다. 이번 사건은 이미 200만 배럴의 원유를 실은 유조선에 대한 이란의 무인기 공격으로 시작되었습니다. 이는 에너지 시장의 불안정성을 높이고, 투자자들에게는 추가적인 리스크를 안길 수 있습니다. 장기적으로는 에너지 시장의 변동성이 증가할 가능성이 높으며, 이는 관련 산업에 대한 투자 결정에 영향을 미칠 것입니다.

본문 3: 국제 사회의 반응과 전망

국제 사회는 이번 미국과 이란 간의 긴장 고조에 대해 다양한 반응을 보이고 있습니다. 특히, 호르무즈 해협의 안정성을 유지하기 위한 국제적인 협력이 필요하다는 의견이 제기되고 있습니다. 이번 아바스 아라그치 장관의 새로운 안보 틀 제안은 이러한 국제적인 협력의 일환으로 해석될 수 있습니다. 그러나, 이란의 군사적 도발과 미국의 강경한 대응이 계속될 경우, 호르무즈 해협의 안정성은 더욱 악화될 가능성이 있습니다. 이는 글로벌 에너지 시장에 미치는 영향을 고려할 때, 투자자들에게는 주의가 필요한 이슈입니다.

결론

이번 기사에서 미국과 이란 간의 긴장이 고조되고 있는 상황을 확인할 수 있었습니다. 특히, 호르무즈 해협의 통제권 다툼은 글로벌 에너지 시장에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있는 중요한 이슈입니다. 앞으로도 이 지역의 안정성을 유지하기 위한 국제적인 협력이 필요하며, 투자자들도 이 지역의 변동성을 고려하여 신중한 투자 결정을 내려야 할 것입니다.


원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiswFBVV95cUxONDI0N2F3NThRSVh0WDFmTTU4dnhBd0kxZXFkUkQyeHMyckhwN1hrT3BaY1dkdVduQlVSR243TzM1cUthMEM5U3FoVG1jUVdKeElGZ2NNT3hJM0JhcnZ5OVNObVZoQzU0UVR3TmM3WEpoNHRoZ3RVN1B4azNZVE9lM2xZLVFPejA5ZTNRMEdscEtNd2NWQWRrWktVbmhDV2NiamEzTndXSU1uc3lfcHlLemZ5UQ?oc=5

Original Article

Iran again asserts control over Strait of Hormuz after Trump's Truth Social annihilation threat - SBS Australia

During a visit to Iraq on Sunday, Abbas Araghchi said: &quot;Any attempt to adopt new or separate arrangements compared to what is underway by the Islamic Republic of Iran will only lead to more complicated situations and delays in the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and will increase the tensions, as we witnessed in the past two nights.&quot; Araghchi called on all parties to &quot;adhere to the memorandum of understanding and not to allow this MoU to deviate from its course&quot; while proposing a new security framework with Gulf countries. &quot;We should reach a new framework that includes all countries in the region &#x2014; and without the presence or interference of any country from outside the region,&quot; he said. The comments came after US President Donald Trump said on Sunday that &quot;the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist&quot; if the US was &quot;forced&quot; to resume the war, accusing Iran of violating the ceasefire. &quot;United States aircraft just struck Iranian missile and drone storage locations, and coastal radar sites, for violating the Cease Fire Agreement, AGAIN!&quot; Trump wrote on Truth Social. &quot;There may come a point when we are no longer able to be reasonable, and will be forced to militarily complete the job that we very successfully started,&quot; he continued. &quot;If that happens, the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist!&quot; The clashes brought new tension to the negotiating process meant to end a war launched by the US and Israel at the end of February. They also underlined the risks still facing one of the world&apos;s most important sea lanes for oil and other commodities. US Central Command said it had struck 10 Iranian military targets in response to an Iranian drone attack on the Panama-flagged oil tanker Kiku, which was carrying some two million barrels of crude. The US military said the response targeted &quot;surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense sites, drone storage facilities, and minelayer capabilities&quot;. Iranian media reported several explosions in the Sirik and Qeshm areas of southern Iran. In retaliation, Iran launched multiple missiles and drones toward neighbouring countries, including Bahrain and Kuwait. The Bahraini military said it had &quot;intercepted and destroyed a number of projectiles used in these treacherous Iranian attacks&quot;, adding that it was on &quot;maximum alert&quot;. Kuwait&apos;s foreign ministry said in a statement that it &quot;expresses its condemnation and denunciation of... in the strongest terms, the recurrence of Iran&apos;s heinous aggression against the State of Kuwait&quot;. A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters said there were no reported US casualties or major impacts or damage to US facilities in the Middle East at this time. Iran&apos;s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said in a statement that US violations of the ceasefire are &quot;contrary&quot; to the recently signed &quot;memorandum of understanding&quot; and &quot;will result in the complete halt of all diplomatic processes&quot;. &quot;If the aggression is repeated, our response will be broader,&quot; it added. The group also said they were taking measures to control traffic in the vital Strait of Hormuz and that violating vessels would be dealt with more firmly than before. The only passage authorised by Tehran passes through a corridor running along Iran&apos;s coast. The IRGC said Iran&apos;s retaliatory strikes had &quot;destroyed eight important US military facilities at the Ali al-Salem base in Kuwait and at the Fifth Fleet naval base in Port Salman in Bahrain&quot;. Israel, meanwhile, launched strikes in Lebanon. Hezbollah&apos;s leader Naim Qassem rejected a deal to end that conflict, which has also threatened to derail the wider US-Iran peace effort. Iran called &quot;these brutal attacks ... a blatant violation&quot; of the interim truce deal. The flare-ups in violence highlighted ongoing wrangling over control of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has warned vessels not to enter or leave the Gulf through the strait without permission, but some vessels have continued to use a non-Iranian-approved passage in the strategic waterway, tracking platforms showed Friday. The IRGC said a day earlier that Oman and the International Maritime Organization announced the new corridor without consulting Tehran, and warned vessels against using it. HA Hellyer, of London think tank the Royal United Services Institute, said: &quot;Iran is likely to continue calibrated, low-level coercive activity in and around the Strait of Hormuz ... to create persistent pressure on international shipping without triggering a wider conflict.&quot; He said November&apos;s US midterm elections for Congress give Washington &quot;incentives for a quicker agreement&quot; while, for Iran, &quot;a drawn-out negotiation accompanied by controlled pressure in the strait can work to its advantage&quot;. Despite the latest flare-up, oil prices have fallen sharply on hopes that traffic through Hormuz would recover. In peacetime, it carries about a fifth of the world&apos;s oil and liquefied natural gas exports. The economic impact on Iran remains unclear, but on Saturday, the country&apos;s statistics agency said that year-on-year inflation had hit 88.6 per cent, up from 68 pe rcent in February. Lebanon was drawn into the Middle East war in early March, when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel in support of Iran. That provoked an Israeli invasion and fighting that has also undermined the US-Iran ceasefire. Israel and Lebanon signed an agreement on Friday supported by the US aimed at securing long-term peace between the two countries. Hezbollah&apos;s chief Qassem rejected the deal a day later, calling it &quot;humiliating, shameful and a surrender of sovereignty&quot;. He instead called for the full implementation of Washington&apos;s deal with Iran, which includes an end to the fighting in Lebanon. Hezbollah has repeatedly called for a full Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon, but the Washington deal does not appear to provide for that. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted Israeli troops will remain in the so-called security zone they occupy in southern Lebanon, with civilians prevented from returning until Hezbollah is disarmed. The Israeli premier called the deal &quot;historic&quot; on Saturday and &quot;a blow to Iran and Hezbollah&quot;. But Netanyahu&apos;s far-right security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, denounced it as &quot;a big mistake&quot; and insisted that only Israeli forces were capable of disarming Hezbollah. The Israeli military said it carried out an airstrike on Saturday targeting suspected militants in Lebanon&apos;s south &#x2014; the first such attack since Washington announced the agreement between the two countries. Lebanon&apos;s National News Agency then reported early Saturday evening that Israel had carried out fresh strikes in the south of the country. The health ministry later reported at least one killed and two wounded in an Israeli airstrike on Nabatieh al-Fawqa. <b><i>download our app</i></b> <b><i>subscribe to our newsletter</i></b>

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiswFBVV95cUxONDI0N2F3NThRSVh0WDFmTTU4dnhBd0kxZXFkUkQyeHMyckhwN1hrT3BaY1dkdVduQlVSR243TzM1cUthMEM5U3FoVG1jUVdKeElGZ2NNT3hJM0JhcnZ5OVNObVZoQzU0UVR3TmM3WEpoNHRoZ3RVN1B4azNZVE9lM2xZLVFPejA5ZTNRMEdscEtNd2NWQWRrWktVbmhDV2NiamEzTndXSU1uc3lfcHlLemZ5UQ?oc=5

주린이 © 2026