미국 상원, 이란 전쟁 중단 요구 결의안 통과
Senate Passes War Resolution Demanding Trump End Hostilities in Iran - Truthout
미국 상원의 Iran에 대한 결의안은 상징적일 뿐, 시장에 즉각적인 영향을 미치지 않을 것으로 보입니다.
핵심 요약
미국 상원은 50대 48의 표결로 트럼프 대통령에게 이란 전쟁 중단 결의안을 통과시켰습니다.
핵심요약
- 미국 상원은 50대 48의 표결로 이란 전쟁 중단 결의안을 통과시켰습니다.
- 4명의 공화당 상원과 대부분의 민주당 상원이 투표에 참여했습니다.
- 이 조치는 법적으로 트럼프 대통령을 강제할 수 없지만 상징적인 의미가 있습니다.
- 미국과 이란은 60일간 휴전을 합의한 상태입니다.
도입
이 기사는 투자자들에게 지정학적 리스크가 시장 변동성에 미치는 영향을 이해하는 데 중요한 통찰력을 제공합니다. 특히 중동 지역에서의 군사적 긴장이 에너지 가격과 글로벌 공급망에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 데 필수적입니다.
본문 1: 지정학적 리스크의 시장 영향
상원의 이란 전쟁 중단 결의안 통과는 중동 지역의 군사적 긴장이 지속될 가능성을 시사합니다. 이는 원유 가격 변동성과 에너지 시장 불안정을 초래할 수 있으며, 이는 에너지 종목의 주가 변동성에 영향을 미칠 것입니다. 특히 중동 지역에서 운영하는 기업들은 공급망 차질과 운영 비용 증가로 인해 수익성에 타격을 입을 수 있습니다.
본문 2: 정치적 불확실성과 투자 전략
이 결의안은 트럼프 행정부의 외교 정책에 대한 의회 내부의 반대가 강화되고 있음을 보여줍니다. 이는 향후 미국 정부의 외교 정책이 더욱 예측하기 어려워질 수 있음을 의미합니다. 투자자들은 정치적 불확실성이 증가함에 따라 포트폴리오 다각화를 고려해야 하며, 특히 중동 지역과 관련된 투자에 대해 신중한 접근이 필요합니다.
결론
이 기사는 지정학적 리스크가 시장 변동성에 미치는 영향을 이해하는 데 중요한 통찰력을 제공합니다. 투자자들은 중동 지역의 군사적 긴장과 정치적 불확실성을 고려하여 포트폴리오를 조정해야 합니다. 향후 미국과 이란 간의 협상 진행 상황과 에너지 시장 변동성을 지속적으로 모니터링하는 것이 중요합니다.
Original Article
Senate Passes War Resolution Demanding Trump End Hostilities in Iran - Truthout
Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today!
On Tuesday, the United States Senate passed a concurrent resolution telling President Donald Trump that if he wants to continue the war on Iran or resume hostilities, he should seek congressional authorization first.
The measure, which has already passed the House of Representatives, is largely symbolic , as it doesn’t carry the legal weight to compel Trump to comply. Still, it signals to the administration that congressional opinion, including among some members of his party, is shifting away from allowing the president to continue the unauthorized war he launched in late February.
The 50-48 vote in favor of the resolution was mostly along party lines . Four Republican senators — Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) — joined with nearly every Democrat in the chamber to pass the resolution. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) was the lone Democrat to vote against the measure. Sens. Dave McCormick (R-Pennsylvania) and Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) were absent for the vote.
While most legal analyses suggest that the measure is unenforceable, at least one Democratic lawmaker indicated that the vote could be used alongside the War Powers Act of 1973 to compel an end to the war through other legal channels .
“Regardless of what President Trump says, this measure is binding under the War Powers Resolution, and I will explore all legal avenues to ensure the executive complies with the will of Congress,” explained House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-New York).
The measure comes as negotiations continue between the U.S. and Iran to create a lasting end to the war. Earlier this month, the two sides agreed to an initial Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), lasting for 60 days, to end hostilities at least temporarily and to hash out remaining disagreements.
In some respects, the MOU already appears to be on shaky ground.
Trump has justified the war by claiming that it secured a promise from Iran’s leaders that they wouldn’t seek a nuclear weapon — a promise they had already made before the war’s start . On Tuesday, he expanded on that claim, stating that Iran had agreed to allow international inspectors back into the country, to ensure they weren’t pursuing nuclear weapon capabilities.
“Iran has fully and completely agreed to highest level Nuclear inspections long into the future (Infinity!!!),” Trump boasted on Truth Social .
However, Iran is disputing that assertion , with leaders of the country saying that no such agreement has yet been made.
Trump has indicated that if Iran breaks promises regarding the MOU or other agreements that have purportedly been made, he would end negotiations “immediately.”
New polling suggests that most Americans are pessimistic about the Trump administration’s ability to produce a deal, and disapprove of his decision to start the war in the first place.
According to an Economist /YouGov poll published this week , two-thirds of Americans, 66 percent, want a deal to be made as quickly as possible, with only 10 percent saying they don’t want that to happen. Eighty-one percent of Americans believe the war will restart if negotiations fail, while only 19 percent say it’s unlikely.
Just a quarter of Americans, 26 percent, said Trump was “right” to start the war. Meanwhile, 54 percent of Americans said that it was the “wrong” decision.
Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. Today, as political censorship from the right intensifies, we have no choice but to ask for your help.
We are fundraising right now to cover our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work. Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support.